W3m-el - Revision history

Elvince: /* External links */ rm emacswiki references

2017-05-17T10:45:53Z

External links: rm emacswiki references

Xophist: removed Category:Browse, as this module is merely part of the package Emacs-w3m

2015-12-02T05:11:06Z

removed Category:Browse, as this module is merely part of the package Emacs-w3m

Xophist: wikilinked to Emacs-w3m

2015-12-02T04:58:48Z

wikilinked to Emacs-w3m

Xophist: clarified that Emacs/W3 includes w3.el

2015-12-02T04:46:10Z

clarified that Emacs/W3 includes w3.el

Xophist: added Emacs/W3 designation for w3 browser

2015-12-02T03:14:40Z

added Emacs/W3 designation for w3 browser

Xophist: removed my outdated note

2015-12-01T17:02:55Z

removed my outdated note

Xophist: added links to Wikepedia

2015-12-01T17:01:30Z

added links to Wikepedia

Elvince: Undo revision 2891 by 188.143.232.12 (talk)

2013-02-13T01:56:29Z

Undo revision 2891 by 188.143.232.12 (talk)

Bozhidar: Reverted edits by 94.23.1.28 (talk) to last revision by 188.143.232.12

2012-06-24T19:46:44Z

Reverted edits by 94.23.1.28 (talk) to last revision by 188.143.232.12

94.23.1.28: UgfWXVCLNcXRJhPqGl

2012-06-22T11:42:12Z

UgfWXVCLNcXRJhPqGl

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:45, 17 May 2017
Line 10:		Line 10:

	w3m.el is in the emacs-w3m package, available from the [http://emacs-w3m.namazu.org/ emacs-w3m homepage]. This requires w3m to be installed. See the emacs-w3m page for details.		w3m.el is in the emacs-w3m package, available from the [http://emacs-w3m.namazu.org/ emacs-w3m homepage]. This requires w3m to be installed. See the emacs-w3m page for details.
−
−	{{Note}} [http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/emacs-w3m Emacswiki:emacs-w3m] states "Using the Emacs interface to w3m is much faster than using w3, since the parsing and displaying is done by the external w3m process." And [http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/w3 Emacswiki:w3] says "For most users who want to browse the web from within Emacs, emacs-w3m will be a better solution, not least because it is quite a bit faster, and as as of May 2010 probably offers a more bug-free browsing experience."

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 2 December 2015
Line 12:		Line 12:

	{{Note}} [http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/emacs-w3m Emacswiki:emacs-w3m] states "Using the Emacs interface to w3m is much faster than using w3, since the parsing and displaying is done by the external w3m process." And [http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/w3 Emacswiki:w3] says "For most users who want to browse the web from within Emacs, emacs-w3m will be a better solution, not least because it is quite a bit faster, and as as of May 2010 probably offers a more bug-free browsing experience."		{{Note}} [http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/emacs-w3m Emacswiki:emacs-w3m] states "Using the Emacs interface to w3m is much faster than using w3, since the parsing and displaying is done by the external w3m process." And [http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/w3 Emacswiki:w3] says "For most users who want to browse the web from within Emacs, emacs-w3m will be a better solution, not least because it is quite a bit faster, and as as of May 2010 probably offers a more bug-free browsing experience."
−
−
−	~~[[Category:Browse]]~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:58, 2 December 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	w3m.el is part of emacs-w3m.	+	w3m.el is part of [[Emacs-w3m\|emacs-w3m]].

	To avoid confusion, note that we have:		To avoid confusion, note that we have:

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 To avoid confusion, note that we have:
-*[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs/W3 Wikipedia:w3]]: aka '''Emacs/W3''', a text-mode web browser completely written in elisp
+*[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs/W3 Wikipedia:w3]]: aka '''Emacs/W3''', a text-mode web browser completely written in elisp; includes w3.el
 *[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W3m Wikipedia:w3m]]: a standalone text-mode browser much like lynx. Not related to Emacs.
 *emacs-w3m: an Emacs interface to the w3m browser. Includes w3m.el, not w3.el
 The [http://www.gnu.org/software/w3/ w3 homepage] says "Development has been dormant for a couple of years, so expect bugs due to bit rot."

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 To avoid confusion, note that we have:
-*[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs/W3 Wikipedia:w3]]: a text-mode web browser completely written in elisp
+*[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs/W3 Wikipedia:w3]]: aka '''Emacs/W3''', a text-mode web browser completely written in elisp
 *[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W3m Wikipedia:w3m]]: a standalone text-mode browser much like lynx. Not related to Emacs.
 *emacs-w3m: an Emacs interface to the w3m browser. Includes w3m.el, not w3.el

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 1 December 2015
Line 15:		Line 15:
	{{Note}} [http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/emacs-w3m Emacswiki:emacs-w3m] states "Using the Emacs interface to w3m is much faster than using w3, since the parsing and displaying is done by the external w3m process." And [http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/w3 Emacswiki:w3] says "For most users who want to browse the web from within Emacs, emacs-w3m will be a better solution, not least because it is quite a bit faster, and as as of May 2010 probably offers a more bug-free browsing experience."		{{Note}} [http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/emacs-w3m Emacswiki:emacs-w3m] states "Using the Emacs interface to w3m is much faster than using w3, since the parsing and displaying is done by the external w3m process." And [http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/w3 Emacswiki:w3] says "For most users who want to browse the web from within Emacs, emacs-w3m will be a better solution, not least because it is quite a bit faster, and as as of May 2010 probably offers a more bug-free browsing experience."

−	~~{{Note}} At this time, getting w3m to run on Windows XP is difficult without Cygwin. The only binary I could find produced a termcap error.~~

	[[Category:Browse]]		[[Category:Browse]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-This is confusing. w3m.el is part of emacs-w3m.
+w3m.el is part of emacs-w3m.
-We have:
+To avoid confusion, note that we have:
-*w3: a text-mode web browser completely written in elisp
+*[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs/W3 Wikipedia:w3]]: a text-mode web browser completely written in elisp
-*w3m: a standalone text-mode browser much like lynx. Not related to Emacs.
+*[[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W3m Wikipedia:w3m]]: a standalone text-mode browser much like lynx. Not related to Emacs.
 *emacs-w3m: an Emacs interface to the w3m browser. Includes w3m.el, not w3.el

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 13 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~Consider Emacs: it~~ is ~~extremely muaoldr and extremely extensible by virtue~~ of ~~it’s embedded Lisp interpreter~~. ~~This is~~ a ~~strange thing to say~~ in a ~~paragraph talking about~~ the ~~Unix Philosophy~~, ~~since Emacs comes from a completely different culture (MIT/ITS/Lisp vs Bell/PDP/C) and~~ is ~~virtually~~ the ~~antithesis of~~ the ~~Unix Way (everything in one process~~, ~~communicating by function calls with rich data types).I love~~ Emacs ~~as much as anybody~~, but ~~I wouldn't claim it~~ has ~~anything~~ to ~~do with Unix~~. ~~We even had a funny name for~~ the ~~Unix port of Emacs ( Gosmacs ) way back when that wasn't~~ the ~~common place~~ to ~~run it!P~~: ~~Have you ever tried building a medium~~-~~large~~-~~scale application (say~~, ~~a project with 50-60 classes) with~~ emacs ~~and gcc? I’m sure it’s possible~~, ~~with persistence Yes~~, ~~I'm working on a large system right now~~ not ~~in C, but~~ it ~~has over 600 classes~~, and ~~I don't know what an IDE could do for me that Emacs can't. find-tag is just~~ as ~~fast with 600 classes~~ as ~~with 6~~. ~~Macros make O(n) editing tasks into O(1) editing tasks~~ on ~~any size project~~.~~What specific feature of an IDE helps you here? Everything~~ I ~~can think of that IDEs brag about, I do in Emacs every day~~.	+	This is confusing. w3m.el is part of emacs-w3m.
		+
		+	We have:
		+
		+	*w3: a text-mode web browser completely written in elisp
		+	*w3m: a standalone text-mode browser much like lynx. Not related to Emacs.
		+	*emacs-w3m: an Emacs interface to the w3m browser. Includes w3m.el, not w3.el
		+
		+	The way to distinguish the browsers is by the command: {{Command\|w3}} for the elisp-only text browser, versus {{Command\|w3m}} for the interface to the non-Emacs browser, with rudimentary inline image support but no JavaScript.
		+
		+	The [http://www.gnu.org/software/w3/ w3 homepage] says "Development has been dormant for a couple of years, so expect bugs due to bit rot."
		+
		+	w3m.el is in the emacs-w3m package, available from the [http://emacs-w3m.namazu.org/ emacs-w3m homepage]. This requires w3m to be installed. See the emacs-w3m page for details.
		+
		+	{{Note}} [http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/emacs-w3m Emacswiki:emacs-w3m] states "Using the Emacs interface to w3m is much faster than using w3, since the parsing and displaying is done by the external w3m process." And [http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/w3 Emacswiki:w3] says "For most users who want to browse the web from within Emacs, emacs-w3m will be a better solution, not least because it is quite a bit faster, and as as of May 2010 probably offers a more bug-free browsing experience."
		+
		+	{{Note}} At this time, getting w3m to run on Windows XP is difficult without Cygwin. The only binary I could find produced a termcap error.
		+
		+	[[Category:Browse]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:46, 24 June 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~i assumed that you were going to ralseee Impossible Shoota source code (because~~ of a ~~reply~~ to ~~someone or maybe~~ a ~~commentary~~ ) ,~~anyway~~ ~~i may~~ had the ~~wrong idea but are you going~~ to ~~ralseee~~ it? I ~~would like to know~~, I ~~will also like to~~ know ~~if you plan to~~ do ~~some tutorials or if you would mind having a half time assistant~~. ~~Im really would like to have some experience~~ as ~~by myself is really hard to even sit~~ on ~~the pc and do something by myself~~ .~~reply when~~ you can ~~and thanks for your time~~.	+	Consider Emacs: it is extremely muaoldr and extremely extensible by virtue of it’s embedded Lisp interpreter. This is a strange thing to say in a paragraph talking about the Unix Philosophy, since Emacs comes from a completely different culture (MIT/ITS/Lisp vs Bell/PDP/C) and is virtually the antithesis of the Unix Way (everything in one process, communicating by function calls with rich data types).I love Emacs as much as anybody, but I wouldn't claim it has anything to do with Unix. We even had a funny name for the Unix port of Emacs ( Gosmacs ) way back when that wasn't the common place to run it!P: Have you ever tried building a medium-large-scale application (say, a project with 50-60 classes) with emacs and gcc? I’m sure it’s possible, with persistence Yes, I'm working on a large system right now not in C, but it has over 600 classes, and I don't know what an IDE could do for me that Emacs can't. find-tag is just as fast with 600 classes as with 6. Macros make O(n) editing tasks into O(1) editing tasks on any size project.What specific feature of an IDE helps you here? Everything I can think of that IDEs brag about, I do in Emacs every day.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:42, 22 June 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~Consider Emacs: it is extremely muaoldr and extremely extensible by virtue~~ of ~~it’s embedded Lisp interpreter. This is~~ a ~~strange thing~~ to ~~say in a paragraph talking about the Unix Philosophy, since Emacs comes from~~ a ~~completely different culture (MIT/ITS/Lisp vs Bell/PDP/C~~) ~~and is virtually the antithesis of the Unix Way (everything in one process~~, ~~communicating by function calls with rich data types).I love Emacs as much as anybody, but I wouldn't claim it has anything to do with Unix.~~ ~~We even~~ had ~~a funny name for~~ the ~~Unix port of Emacs ( Gosmacs ) way back when that wasn't the common place~~ to ~~run~~ it~~!P: Have you ever tried building a medium-large-scale application (say, a project with 50-60 classes) with emacs and gcc~~? ~~I’m sure it’s possible, with persistence Yes,~~ I~~'m working on a large system right now not in C, but it has over 600 classes~~, ~~and~~ I ~~don't~~ know ~~what an IDE could~~ do ~~for me that Emacs can't~~. ~~find-tag~~ is ~~just as fast with 600 classes as with 6. Macros make O(n) editing tasks into O(1) editing tasks~~ on ~~any size project~~.~~What specific feature of an IDE helps~~ you ~~here? Everything I~~ can ~~think of that IDEs brag about, I do in Emacs every day~~.	+	i assumed that you were going to ralseee Impossible Shoota source code (because of a reply to someone or maybe a commentary ) ,anyway i may had the wrong idea but are you going to ralseee it? I would like to know, I will also like to know if you plan to do some tutorials or if you would mind having a half time assistant. Im really would like to have some experience as by myself is really hard to even sit on the pc and do something by myself .reply when you can and thanks for your time.