Talk:Org

2015-07-30T18:31:02Z

63.233.0.146:

The devil, as always, is in the details. From Bozhidar Batsov’s [http://batsov.com/articles/2012/03/20/die-emacswiki/ original post]:

<blockquote>
Action Plan for The Maintainers:

Drop the current format of the wiki - use something standard like MediaWiki instead of OddMuse. Drop all the articles about Emacs extensions. Drop all the extensions hosted there. Assemble a team of moderators. Accept only articles about general Emacs usage and Emacs Lisp programming.</blockquote>

Give the above general action plan, I would think that we do not want to spend time and effort replicating documentation, tips-n-tricks, etc. from established projects that have these things. I added some basic links about the Org-Mode community, and don't really think we should go much further.

[[User:SkydiveMike|SkydiveMike]] 13:43, 24 March 2012 (EET)

Indeed. org-mode is actively developed outside Emacs and has an extremely good documentation.

[[User:Bozhidar|Bozhidar]] 15:39, 24 March 2012 (EET)

should we apply http://wikemacs.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_major-mode? --[[User:Jstein|Jstein]] 10:31, 2 October 2012 (EEST)

Would it be outside of the scope to link to one (and only one) good introduction to org mode? Since org is such a talked about part of Emacs, and since the org website lists 17 unsorted things as "general tutorials", and since the one "Organize Your Life in Plain Text!" link "assumes you've had some exposure to org-mode already so concepts like the agenda, capture mode, etc. won't be completely foreign to you".
Or would that be outside of the scope, and should be asked more of the people maintaining Worg?
[[Special:Contributions/63.233.0.146|63.233.0.146]] 14:31, 30 July 2015 (EDT)

WikEmacs - User contributions [en]

Talk:Org